Karnataka HM criticizes Centre for Prajwal Revanna’s passport cancellation.
Prajwal, the NDA candidate from Hassan Lok Sabha segment and grandson of JD(S) patriarch H D Deve Gowda, is accused of sexually abusing women, prompting the cancellation of his passport.
Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara minced no words in his criticism of the Centre on Saturday, following revelations regarding the handling of the request to impound the diplomatic passport of Hassan MP Prajwal Revanna, who is facing serious allegations. Parameshwara’s remarks came in the wake of a statement by the Ministry of External Affairs indicating that they had only received the state government’s request on May 21, despite Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s earlier correspondence with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in April.
Expressing his incredulity at the delay, Parameshwara questioned the apparent lapse in communication between the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and the Ministry of External Affairs. He highlighted the discrepancy between the timing of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s letter and the date the External Affairs Ministry claims to have received it, suggesting a breakdown in the administrative process.
Addressing reporters, Parameshwara referred to a reported interview with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, where the latter acknowledged receiving the request only on May 21. Parameshwara’s pointed response indicated his disbelief at the perceived lack of coordination within the government machinery. He implied that the delay in processing the request reflected poorly on the efficiency and effectiveness of the central government.
Moreover, Parameshwara’s remarks hinted at a broader frustration with the functioning of the Centre, suggesting a deeper discontent with the governance model. By questioning the handling of the passport issue, he indirectly criticized the central government’s ability to address pressing matters promptly and efficiently.
The Home Minister also underscored the significance of revoking Prajwal Revanna’s diplomatic passport, noting that its cancellation would compel him to return to India. This observation underscores the potential implications of administrative decisions on individuals facing legal challenges, emphasizing the importance of cooperation between state and central authorities in addressing such matters.
Parameshwara’s remarks reflect a broader trend of political tensions between the state and central governments, with issues such as administrative efficiency and coordination often becoming flashpoints for disagreement. The handling of Prajwal Revanna’s case has brought these tensions to the fore, highlighting the complexities of governance in a federal system.
As the controversy surrounding Prajwal Revanna’s passport cancellation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the central government will respond to the criticisms leveled by Karnataka’s Home Minister. The case serves as a reminder of the intricate dynamics of intergovernmental relations and the challenges of governing in a multi-layered political system.
Overall, Parameshwara’s comments underscore the broader theme of accountability and transparency in governance, highlighting the need for improved coordination and communication between different levels of government. The episode also raises questions about the role of political leadership in ensuring effective governance and addressing public concerns in a timely manner.
In conclusion, Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara’s criticism of the Centre’s handling of the Prajwal Revanna passport issue reflects broader concerns about administrative efficiency and coordination within the government. His remarks highlight the importance of accountability and transparency in governance, underscoring the need for improved communication and cooperation between different levels of government. As the controversy continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the complexities of governing in a federal system and the challenges of managing intergovernmental relations.
Prajwal Revanna, scion of the JD(S) dynasty and the NDA candidate for the Hassan Lok Sabha constituency, finds himself embroiled in a scandalous controversy. Accused of sexually abusing women, Prajwal’s actions have thrust him into the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. His familial ties to H D Deve Gowda, the patriarch of the JD(S), only serve to magnify the gravity of the situation.
The unfolding drama took an international turn when Prajwal reportedly fled to Germany on April 27, just a day after the polls in Hassan. His sudden departure raised eyebrows and fueled speculation about his intentions and whereabouts. Despite the efforts of law enforcement agencies to locate him, Prajwal remains at large, evading capture and accountability for his alleged crimes.
In a bid to track down the fugitive politician, Interpol has issued a ‘Blue Corner Notice’, soliciting information on Prajwal’s whereabouts. This international alert, initiated at the behest of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) via the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), underscores the seriousness of the allegations against him and the urgency to apprehend him.
The legal noose around Prajwal tightened further when a Special Court for Elected Representatives issued an arrest warrant against him. This development followed an application filed by the SIT, signaling a decisive step towards bringing Prajwal to justice. However, his continued evasion poses a challenge to law enforcement authorities tasked with ensuring his swift apprehension.
The allegations of sexual abuse against Prajwal have sent shockwaves through the political landscape, tarnishing his reputation and casting a shadow over his family’s legacy. As a scion of the powerful JD(S) dynasty, Prajwal’s fall from grace has reverberated across the corridors of power, sparking widespread condemnation and calls for accountability.
The case has also reignited debates about the prevalence of sexual misconduct in politics and the need for stringent measures to hold perpetrators accountable. Prajwal’s status as a prominent political figure highlights the pervasive nature of such abuses of power and the challenges faced by victims in seeking justice.
Moreover, the international dimension of Prajwal’s flight adds a layer of complexity to the case, raising questions about extradition laws and cross-border cooperation in criminal matters. As efforts to locate him intensify, the spotlight remains firmly trained on Prajwal, with the public eagerly awaiting his apprehension and the resolution of the case.
In conclusion, Prajwal Revanna’s alleged involvement in sexual abuse allegations has thrust him into a whirlwind of controversy and legal troubles. His flight from justice, coupled with the international pursuit launched by Interpol, underscores the gravity of the situation. As the saga unfolds, the quest for accountability and justice for the victims remains paramount, highlighting the need for swift and decisive action to address such egregious acts of misconduct.