President Murmu asks SC about timelines on bills
Introduction to the Presidential Reference
President Droupadi Murmu has recently submitted a presidential reference to the Supreme Court, raising crucial questions about the timelines for the assent of state bills. This inquiry aims to clarify whether the Supreme Court can utilize its inherent powers under Article 142 to impose specific timelines and dictate the conduct of governors and the president when it comes to state legislation.
Key Questions Addressed in the Reference
The presidential reference, issued under Article 143 of the Constitution, specifically seeks clarification on the constitutional options available to governors regarding bills presented to them under Article 200. An essential aspect of this inquiry is understanding if judicial orders can govern the timing and methods by which the president and governors operate while addressing state bills.
Implications of the Supreme Court’s Opinion
The outcome of this presidential reference holds significant implications for constitutional governance and the relationship between state and federal authorities. As Justice Sanjiv Khanna’s term concluded, the responsibility now lies with Chief Justice B. Gavai to convene a constitution bench to assess this matter. The public and legal community alike will be keenly observing how the Supreme Court defines the scope and contours of Article 142 in relation to the functioning of governors and the president in state legislative processes.
This move comes amid growing concerns over delays in the clearance of crucial legislation passed by State Assemblies. The Supreme Court’s opinion is expected to provide guidance on the constitutional responsibilities and timeframes for action by the President and Governors. The issue has significant implications for Centre-State relations and the legislative process within India’s federal structure, potentially affecting governance and policy implementation across states.