Amit Shah calls Kejriwal’s remark ‘contempt of Supreme Court.’
Arvind Kejriwal’s statement, implying immunity from jail if his party and I.N.D.I.A bloc candidates win in the ongoing Lok Sabha Elections, has drawn criticism from Amit Shah. Shah condemned the remark, labeling it as “contempt of court.” Kejriwal’s assertion has sparked controversy, with Shah’s response highlighting the seriousness of the issue. The exchange underscores the tense political atmosphere surrounding the elections and the scrutiny faced by political leaders for their statements.
Union Home Minister Amit Shah strongly criticized Arvind Kejriwal’s recent statement during the ongoing Lok Sabha Elections, where Kejriwal implied that voting for him would prevent him from going to jail. Shah described Kejriwal’s appeal to the public as “no bigger contempt of the Supreme Court.” Kejriwal, who is campaigning on interim bail, made these statements during roadshows in Delhi and Punjab.
Shah’s remarks, made in an interview with news agency ANI, emphasized the gravity of Kejriwal’s statement, implying that the Supreme Court’s decisions could be influenced by electoral outcomes. Shah stated, “There can be no bigger contempt of the Supreme Court than this. Will Supreme Court make decisions on (electoral) victory and loss?” This statement underscores Shah’s concern about the integrity of judicial processes and the need to uphold the authority and independence of the judiciary.
Responding to questions regarding the Supreme Court’s decision to grant interim bail to Kejriwal, Shah expressed dissatisfaction with the way the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) portrayed the court’s ruling as a “victory of Kejriwal.” He clarified that the interim bail should not be misconstrued as a “clean chit” for Kejriwal. This assertion suggests Shah’s belief that the interim bail does not absolve Kejriwal of any wrongdoing and should not be used to manipulate public perception or electoral outcomes.
The exchange between Shah and Kejriwal highlights the intense political atmosphere surrounding the Lok Sabha Elections and the scrutiny faced by political leaders for their statements and actions. Shah’s condemnation of Kejriwal’s remarks reflects concerns about the integrity of democratic processes and the need to uphold the rule of law.
Kejriwal’s assertion during his election campaign has raised questions about the ethical boundaries of political discourse and the implications of such statements on public trust in democratic institutions. Shah’s response underscores the importance of holding political leaders accountable for their words and actions, especially when they undermine the principles of democracy and the rule of law.
Overall, Shah’s remarks on Kejriwal’s interim bail and his campaign statements underscore the broader challenges facing Indian democracy, including the need to ensure the independence of the judiciary, uphold ethical standards in political discourse, and maintain public trust in democratic institutions.
Amit Shah refrained from directly commenting on the Supreme Court’s decision regarding Arvind Kejriwal’s interim bail but expressed concern over how some parties, media outlets, and journalists portrayed it as a victory for Kejriwal. He clarified that the interim bail does not equate to a clean chit, as the chargesheet is still pending before the Supreme Court. Shah criticized Kejriwal’s confidence, suggesting that if he was truly innocent, he should have sought quashing of the charges before the Sessions Court.
Shah also took a dig at Kejriwal, asserting that people will remember him for his alleged involvement in the liquor scam. He stated, “As a voter, I believe that wherever he will go, people will remember the liquor scam… Kayi logon ko toh badi bottle dikhai padegi,” in a sarcastic reference to the AAP chief’s association with the alleged scam. This remark reflects Shah’s strategy to remind voters of Kejriwal’s controversies, potentially influencing public opinion during the ongoing Lok Sabha Elections.
During his campaign trail, Arvind Kejriwal made statements suggesting that if people vote for AAP and I.N.D.I.A bloc candidates, he would not have to return to jail. He urged voters to press the ‘Jhaadu’ (broom) button, symbolizing AAP, to prevent his arrest. Kejriwal warned against pressing any other button, implying that voting for other parties could lead to his imprisonment. He also cautioned voters about the alleged intentions of other parties to secure 400 seats to abolish reservations and the Constitution, leading to dictatorship.
Kejriwal’s remarks were made during a roadshow in Amritsar, with Bhagwant Mann by his side. These statements come after the Supreme Court granted Kejriwal interim bail on May 10, allowing him to campaign for the Lok Sabha Elections. However, his assertions about the consequences of voting for other parties have stirred controversy.
In a recent interview, Amit Shah expressed concerns about the perception that the Supreme Court gave special treatment to Kejriwal. He stated, “I believe this is not a routine judgement. A lot of people in this country believe that special treatment has been given.” Shah’s comments reflect wider apprehensions about the fairness and impartiality of the judiciary’s decision regarding Kejriwal’s bail.
Overall, Kejriwal’s campaign statements have sparked debate and criticism, with Shah’s remarks highlighting concerns about the perceived favoritism in the judicial process. The exchange underscores the tense political climate surrounding the Lok Sabha Elections and the scrutiny faced by political leaders for their statements and actions.