Amartya Sen: Lok Sabha poll results show India not ‘Hindu Rashtra’.
He criticized the practice, highlighting concerns about human rights violations and the erosion of due process. Sen’s remarks underscored his ongoing advocacy for justice and fairness within India’s legal system, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional rights and freedoms. The Nobel laureate’s stance reflects broader concerns within civil society regarding civil liberties and the rule of law. His criticism serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in balancing security measures with the protection of individual rights in democratic societies.
Nobel laureate Amartya Sen arrived in Kolkata from the US on Wednesday and asserted that the recent Lok Sabha poll results indicate that India is not a ‘Hindu Rashtra’. Speaking to a Bengali news channel at the Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport, Sen expressed his views on various issues concerning India’s political landscape.
Sen voiced his displeasure over the “continuation” of practices such as putting people behind bars “without trial” under the new dispensation. He criticized these actions, emphasizing the importance of upholding human rights and due process.
“The election results clearly show that India is not a ‘Hindu Rashtra’. We always hope for change after every election. However, some issues from the past, such as the unjust detention of individuals without trial and the widening wealth gap, continue to persist. These practices need to be halted,” Sen remarked.
The eminent economist stressed the need for political openness, especially in a secular country like India with a secular Constitution. He expressed his disapproval of the idea of transforming India into a ‘Hindu Rashtra’, stating that such a concept is not appropriate for a diverse and pluralistic society.
“At 90 years old, I do not think the idea of turning India into a ‘Hindu Rashtra’ is appropriate. We must maintain the secular fabric of our nation and respect the diversity that defines us,” Sen asserted.
Sen’s comments come amidst ongoing debates and discussions about India’s political direction and the protection of democratic values. His observations on the election outcomes and socio-political issues reflect his longstanding advocacy for justice, equality, and the principles of democracy. As a respected intellectual and Nobel laureate, Sen’s perspectives carry significant weight in shaping public discourse on critical issues facing the country.
Amartya Sen further critiqued the composition of the new Union cabinet, describing it as “a copy of the earlier one.” He noted that while there had been a minor reshuffle, the politically influential figures retained their positions of power within the government.
“The ministers continue to hold similar portfolios. Despite a slight reshuffle, the politically powerful are still powerful,” Sen remarked.
Reflecting on India’s historical context, Sen recalled instances from his childhood during British rule when people were unjustly imprisoned without trial.
Commenting on the BJP’s loss of the Faizabad Lok Sabha seat despite their efforts in building the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, Sen criticized the attempt to reshape India’s identity.
Sen’s remarks highlight his concerns about political continuity, social justice, and preserving India’s secular ethos amidst ongoing societal and political transformations. As a prominent intellectual and advocate for democratic values, his perspectives contribute significantly to discussions on India’s socio-political landscape and its future direction.
Sen also expressed concerns about rising unemployment in India, pointing out that sectors such as primary education and primary healthcare were being neglected. He highlighted these issues as critical areas needing attention amidst broader socio-economic challenges facing the country. Sen’s remarks underscored his longstanding advocacy for equitable development and social justice, emphasizing the importance of investing in essential public services to address the needs of the population effectively. His observations reflect a broader critique of policy priorities and their impact on vulnerable segments of society, urging for greater focus and investment in sectors crucial for sustainable development and inclusive growth.