President’s rule in Manipur extended by six months.

President’s rule in Manipur extended by six months.

The move marks a significant step forward, reflecting a broad political consensus. Leaders across party lines spoke in support, highlighting its importance for the nation. With this approval, the resolution is now set to become a landmark decision, resonating with the hopes and concerns of the people.

New Delhi, August 6 – In a significant yet contentious session, the Indian Parliament on Tuesday approved a statutory resolution extending President’s Rule in the strife-torn state of Manipur for another six months, beyond August 13. The resolution, which was passed by the Lok Sabha last week, received the Rajya Sabha’s approval through a voice vote, despite disruptions and protests from Opposition members.

The Upper House witnessed tense scenes as the resolution was taken up. Chaos broke out with Opposition MPs raising concerns over the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, causing repeated interruptions during the session. Despite the uproar, Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh maintained order and called the passage of the resolution a “constitutional obligation.”

A State in Turmoil

The situation in Manipur remains fragile, with deepening mistrust between communities following violent clashes that began over a year ago. The state’s troubles stem from a complex mix of ethnic tensions, administrative breakdown, and judicial decisions that have stirred long-standing grievances.

While tabling the resolution, Minister of State for Home Affairs Nityanand Rai addressed the House, urging members to view the issue with sensitivity and not politicize the situation.

Those who say it is communal violence are wrong,” Rai said, defending the government’s handling of the crisis amid a backdrop of loud protests from the Opposition benches.

Only "One Incident of Violence"

Rai further stated that in the eight months since President’s Rule was first imposed, only one incident of violence had been reported, suggesting that the law and order situation had seen some level of improvement under central control. However, Opposition MPs remained unconvinced and continued to express dismay over the lack of political dialogue and visible resolution efforts on the ground.

The Minister did not elaborate on the court order that allegedly triggered the divide, but his remarks hinted at the controversial Manipur High Court directive in 2023, which suggested that the Meitei community be considered for Scheduled Tribe status — a move that had drawn strong opposition from tribal groups, leading to violent confrontations.

Opposition Raises Questions, Seeks Accountability

than facilitating political reconciliation and dialogue.

Speaking outside the House, several Opposition leaders condemned the government’s approach, stating that the Centre had abdicated its responsibility by relying solely on administrative measures while ignoring humanitarian concerns.

“What Manipur needs is healing, not just rule by decree. Others demanded a clear roadmap for peace and the restoration of elected governance in the state.

A Voice Vote Amid Silence from Manipur

Despite the heated debate, the resolution was ultimately passed by a voice vote in the Rajya Sabha. There was no recorded division, a move that some MPs criticized as undermining democratic scrutiny.

Many in the state, weary from months of unrest, are calling for healing, justice, and a return to normal political life.

What Lies Ahead?

The extension of President’s Rule means that administrative powers in Manipur will continue to rest with the Centre, under the guidance of the Governor, rather than with an elected state government. While the move is being positioned as a necessary measure to maintain peace, it also reflects the ongoing challenges in restoring trust between communities and rebuilding institutions.

As Parliament moves forward with legislative business, the situation in Manipur remains a stark reminder of how fragile peace can be — and how important it is for both ruling and opposition parties to rise above politics when human lives and the unity of a state are at stake.