Supreme Court refrains from interim orders to ECI on LS poll turnout.
The Election Commission of India (ECI) conveyed to the Supreme Court that divulging scanned, legible copies of accounts detailing votes cast at every polling station could potentially disrupt the election machinery, citing concerns of “chaos.” This stance emerged in response to a plea urging the court to mandate the ECI to disclose such information following each phase of the Lok Sabha polls.
The ECI’s argument underscores the delicate balance between transparency and operational efficiency in the electoral process. While transparency is paramount for upholding the integrity of democratic elections, the practical implications of disclosing such extensive documentation during an ongoing electoral process cannot be overlooked.
The ECI’s concerns highlight the complexities involved in managing large-scale elections, where meticulous planning and coordination are imperative to ensure a smooth and orderly voting process. Balancing the public’s right to information with the need to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the electoral machinery remains a key challenge for election authorities, necessitating careful consideration by the judiciary in addressing such matters.
In a recent development, the Supreme Court declined to issue interim directives to the Election Commission of India (ECI) regarding the disclosure of authenticated records of voter turnout.The decision was made by a bench comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and S.C. Sharma, who opted to defer the matter for a hearing post-summer vacations.
The bench asserted that issuing interim directions at this juncture would effectively amount to providing final relief in the petitions. They advocated for a “hands-off” approach once the election process is underway. This cautious stance reflects the judiciary’s recognition of the sensitivity and complexity inherent in electoral proceedings.
The Election Commission, in response to the plea, voiced concerns about the potential repercussions of disclosing scanned, legible copies of accounts detailing votes recorded at all polling stations. The Commission argued that such a move would likely result in “chaos” within the election machinery. This perspective underscores the Commission’s apprehension regarding the practical implications of transparency measures on the smooth functioning of the electoral process.
In its affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, the ECI elaborated on the challenges posed by introducing changes to the electoral procedures midway through the process. The Commission emphasized that any alterations introduced towards the conclusion of the election period would create hardship and confusion. Additionally, it highlighted the logistical difficulties associated with providing adequate training to polling parties tasked with overseeing the final phases of the election.
The affidavit underscores the ECI’s commitment to maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the electoral process. While transparency is a fundamental aspect of democratic elections, the Commission’s apprehensions highlight the need to balance transparency measures with the practical considerations of managing large-scale electoral events.
The Supreme Court’s decision to defer the matter for post-summer vacation hearing reflects a thoughtful approach to addressing the complex issues surrounding electoral transparency and procedural integrity. It underscores the importance of careful deliberation and consideration of all relevant factors in safeguarding the democratic process.
As the Lok Sabha elections continue to unfold, stakeholders will closely monitor developments regarding the disclosure of voter turnout records. Ultimately, ensuring transparency while preserving the efficiency and credibility of the electoral process remains paramount in upholding the democratic ideals of the nation.
Chandrachud, has granted the Election Commission of India (ECI) a week to respond to an application seeking directions for the disclosure of authenticated voter turnout records on its official website. Specifically, the plea requested the publication of scanned, legible copies of Form 17C Part-I (Account of Votes Recorded) for all polling stations within 48 hours of the close of polling.
Moreover, the application called for the provision of a tabulation showcasing constituency and polling station-wise voter turnout figures, both in absolute numbers and percentage form, for the ongoing general elections. The plea argued that such transparency is essential for ensuring accountability and integrity in the electoral process.
Citing instances where voter turnout data was released significantly later than expected, the application highlighted concerns regarding potential delays in declaring election results. It pointed out discrepancies in the initially reported voter turnout percentages compared to the figures released by the ECI days after polling.
The application accused the ECI of “dereliction of duty” for failing to promptly disclose accurate voter turnout data, potentially leading to public mistrust in the electoral process. It emphasized the importance of timely and transparent dissemination of election-related information to uphold the principles of democracy.
The Supreme Court’s decision to grant the ECI a week to respond reflects its commitment to ensuring fair and transparent elections. By providing the ECI with an opportunity to address the concerns raised in the application, the court seeks to promote accountability and uphold the integrity of the electoral process.
As the ECI prepares its response, stakeholders will await further developments regarding the disclosure of voter turnout records and the broader issue of transparency in electoral proceedings. Ultimately, the court’s intervention serves as a reminder of the vital role played by independent institutions in safeguarding democratic principles and promoting public trust in the electoral process.
The Election Commission of India (ECI) replied stating that the voter turnout app continuously updates data in real-time, while Form 17C is provided to candidates’ agents after polling ends, as per legal requirements. The ECI emphasized that voters and candidates have legal recourse through election petitions, yet no such petitions were filed regarding alleged discrepancies in voter turnout data. The affidavit highlighted the advanced stage of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections and cautioned against petitions causing suspicion or hindering the electoral process. Additionally, it condemned baseless allegations and efforts to sow doubt in the electoral process, labeling them as malicious campaigns.