"Don't Marry Just Because You Want To": Twisha Sharma's Last Messages

“I’m trapped, don’t suffer like me,” Twisha wrote

“I’m trapped, don’t suffer like me,” Twisha wrote

Noida woman Twisha found dead at Bhopal residence

The last messages sent by 33‑year‑old Twisha Sharma have resurfaced this week, offering a quiet, painful window into the state of mind of a young woman who felt increasingly anxious, isolated and “trapped” in the days before her death. Found hanging at her husband’s house in Bhopal’s Katara Hills on May 12, Twisha’s final weeks now read less like a single headline and more like a series of small, human moments that build into a larger, tragic story.

Originally from Noida, Uttar Pradesh, Twisha had completed an MBA and worked in Delhi for several years before meeting Samarth Singh — a lawyer — on a dating app in 2024. They married in December 2025 and moved to Bhopal. By all outward appearances, the arc was familiar to many: education, career, romantic meeting, marriage. But the messages Twisha sent to friends reveal an interior life where reassurance and unease coexisted uneasily.

On May 7, in a WhatsApp chat with a friend, she wrote plainly: “I have been under anxiety.” The sentence is small and direct, an admission many find difficult even to voice. In other conversations, she spoke about feeling stuck, missing her home in Noida, and struggling to find direction after marriage. At times she seemed to play down her condition, offering lightness where there was burden — a familiar coping habit that hides pain from those who care.

These fragments of text matter because they humanize a person who might otherwise be reduced to headlines and speculation. They suggest a woman trying to make sense of a new life while holding on to the routines and identities that once steadied her. Friends recall a person who could joke and reassure one moment and express sorrow the next — a complexity that fits many lived experiences of migration, marriage and adjustment.

For families and friends, such messages create a painful aftertaste of “what if.” If someone says they’re anxious, can those closest to them always create the conditions for safety and recovery? Sometimes yes; sometimes the barriers are practical: distance, work commitments, social stigma about mental health, or a partner who may not recognize the signs. In Twisha’s case, those who knew her describe the common difficulties migrants face — leaving familiar support networks, navigating a new household, and reconciling expectations with reality.

The context is important. India is seeing a rising public conversation about mental health, but stigma still runs deep in many communities. Admissions of anxiety or sadness can be minimized or misread; casual reassurances like “you’ll be fine” or “it’s just a phase” are well‑meaning but sometimes insufficient. For married women who relocate, the transition can be emotionally complex: the loss of workplace identity, shifts in daily routine, and changes in social circles all matter. Smaller things — missing favourite foods, not having close friends nearby, or feeling unheard at home — can accumulate into something heavier.

Authorities are investigating Twisha’s death to establish the facts. As with any ongoing probe, caution is necessary before drawing firm conclusions. Yet the human elements revealed through her messages speak to broader patterns worth attention: the limits of casual emotional labor, the need for accessible mental health support, and the importance of creating environments where people can speak honestly without fear of judgment.

There are practical lessons here. Friends and family who receive worrying messages might ask direct questions: Are you safe? Do you have someone with you? Would you like me to call? If a person says they are anxious, offering to accompany them to a doctor, help them contact a mental‑health professional, or simply check in more frequently can make a critical difference. Employers and communities can help by normalising discussions about mental health, offering counselling services, and protecting employees who relocate after marriage or other life changes.

Twisha’s story is also a reminder that grief and prevention are public goods. When someone’s small messages of distress become part of a public narrative, it is tempting to search for blame or easy explanations. A more productive response combines empathy with action: listening without judgment, strengthening support networks, and ensuring that avenues for help — hotlines, counselling services, community outreach — are visible and accessible.

Behind the procedural updates and investigative bulletins is a family now coping with an irretrievable loss and friends who will carry her last words with them. The private fragments she left — “I have been under anxiety,” snapshots of loneliness, attempts to reassure others — are echoes of a human life that sought both connection and relief. If there is any solace to be drawn, it is that her messages can now spur conversations and concrete steps that might help others in similar pain.

As the investigation proceeds, the broader hope is that communities learn to listen more attentively, act more decisively, and treat admissions of distress not as inconveniences but as urgent calls for care. In remembering Twisha, that human-centred response would be the most meaningful tribute.

Leave a Comment